+99.3%
DINO vs LNT
+48.2%
+51.1%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -1.1% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +2.0% | +0.2% | +1.8% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +27.7% | -0.5% | +28.2% | +27.7% |
| 3M | +56.3% | -5.5% | +61.8% | +57.1% |
| 6M | +107.6% | -3.8% | +111.4% | +107.3% |
| YTD | +140.2% | +6.8% | +133.3% | +134.3% |
| 1Y | +113.0% | +9.3% | +103.7% | +106.9% |
| All | +99.3% | +48.2% | +51.1% | +79.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling