+99.3%
DINO vs LH
+63.5%
+35.8%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -1.2% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +2.0% | -3.2% | +5.1% | +2.5% |
| 30D | +27.7% | +0.1% | +27.5% | +27.6% |
| 3M | +56.3% | +18.6% | +37.7% | +51.2% |
| 6M | +107.6% | +17.9% | +89.6% | +100.8% |
| YTD | +140.2% | +28.9% | +111.2% | +126.1% |
| 1Y | +113.0% | +16.6% | +96.4% | +106.1% |
| All | +99.3% | +63.5% | +35.8% | +71.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling