+107.1%
DINO vs LDOS
+37.8%
+69.3%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +1.1% | -2.1% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -12.9% | +1.9% | -14.7% | -13.0% |
| 30D | -18.6% | +12.8% | -31.4% | -19.3% |
| 3M | +16.6% | -1.0% | +17.6% | +16.5% |
| 6M | +38.2% | +6.2% | +32.0% | +38.1% |
| YTD | +119.3% | -23.2% | +142.6% | +125.4% |
| 1Y | +84.3% | -29.5% | +113.8% | +91.9% |
| 3Y | +107.1% | +37.1% | +70.1% | +89.8% |
| All | +107.1% | +37.8% | +69.3% | +89.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling