+96.5%
DINO vs LDOS
+32.3%
+64.3%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -2.3% | +1.7% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -15.5% | -7.2% | -8.3% | -15.1% |
| 30D | -16.0% | +16.8% | -32.8% | -16.9% |
| 3M | +17.9% | -1.6% | +19.5% | +17.9% |
| 6M | +38.5% | -1.0% | +39.5% | +39.1% |
| YTD | +115.8% | -25.8% | +141.6% | +122.4% |
| 1Y | +87.1% | -31.1% | +118.2% | +95.1% |
| 3Y | +96.5% | +32.8% | +63.7% | +73.0% |
| All | +96.5% | +32.3% | +64.3% | +73.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling