+100.4%
DINO vs LCID
-92.3%
+192.6%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.8% | -1.1% | +3.8% | +2.8% |
| 7D | +4.2% | +1.8% | +2.4% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +33.9% | -34.2% | +68.1% | +37.0% |
| 3M | +50.5% | -9.1% | +59.7% | +49.9% |
| 6M | +95.2% | -52.6% | +147.8% | +102.1% |
| YTD | +140.6% | -56.2% | +196.8% | +149.8% |
| 1Y | +119.0% | -74.9% | +193.8% | +135.0% |
| 3Y | +100.4% | -92.1% | +192.5% | +116.2% |
| All | +100.4% | -92.3% | +192.6% | +116.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling