+495.9%
DINO vs LCID
-95.9%
+591.9%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -2.1% | +1.7% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +1.5% | -9.1% | +10.6% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +25.9% | -37.6% | +63.5% | +28.6% |
| 3M | +53.2% | -11.1% | +64.2% | +52.8% |
| 6M | +105.5% | -59.2% | +164.6% | +112.4% |
| YTD | +139.2% | -60.5% | +199.7% | +147.2% |
| 1Y | +117.4% | -78.5% | +195.9% | +130.8% |
| 3Y | +99.3% | -92.8% | +192.1% | +117.0% |
| 5Y | +333.0% | -97.9% | +430.9% | +381.9% |
| All | +495.9% | -95.9% | +591.9% | +642.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling