+99.3%
DINO vs IRM
+102.2%
-2.9%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IRM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.7% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +2.0% | +3.0% | -1.1% | +1.3% |
| 30D | +27.7% | -5.2% | +32.9% | +29.0% |
| 3M | +56.3% | -8.0% | +64.3% | +58.5% |
| 6M | +107.6% | +9.2% | +98.4% | +101.2% |
| YTD | +140.2% | +41.0% | +99.2% | +117.0% |
| 1Y | +113.0% | +23.3% | +89.7% | +98.9% |
| All | +99.3% | +102.2% | -2.9% | +53.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IRM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IRM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IRM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IRM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling