+99.3%
DINO vs HUBB
+44.4%
+54.9%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HUBB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -2.1% | +1.9% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +2.0% | +1.1% | +0.9% | +1.8% |
| 30D | +27.7% | -9.6% | +37.3% | +30.0% |
| 3M | +56.3% | -6.2% | +62.5% | +57.0% |
| 6M | +107.6% | -6.2% | +113.7% | +106.6% |
| YTD | +140.2% | +3.4% | +136.8% | +131.5% |
| 1Y | +113.0% | +5.3% | +107.7% | +103.0% |
| All | +99.3% | +44.4% | +54.9% | +75.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HUBB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HUBB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HUBB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HUBB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling