+239.9%
DINO vs GTLB
-47.1%
+287.0%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | +1.1% | -1.8% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +5.7% | +11.1% | -5.3% | +4.7% |
| 30D | +27.8% | +37.8% | -10.0% | +24.0% |
| 3M | +45.6% | +61.6% | -15.9% | +39.0% |
| 6M | +88.5% | +98.9% | -10.5% | +75.9% |
| YTD | +134.1% | +32.8% | +101.3% | +125.5% |
| 1Y | +111.1% | +14.7% | +96.5% | +105.1% |
| 3Y | +109.1% | +1.3% | +107.8% | +100.7% |
| All | +239.9% | -47.1% | +287.0% | +216.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling