+99.3%
DINO vs GRMN
+179.1%
-79.7%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -1.3% | +1.1% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +2.0% | -1.4% | +3.4% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +27.7% | -13.1% | +40.8% | +29.8% |
| 3M | +56.3% | +14.9% | +41.4% | +53.1% |
| 6M | +107.6% | +13.1% | +94.4% | +102.9% |
| YTD | +140.2% | +35.3% | +104.9% | +125.1% |
| 1Y | +113.0% | +16.0% | +97.0% | +106.3% |
| All | +99.3% | +179.1% | -79.7% | +72.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling