+184.3%
DINO vs GLXY
-38.3%
+222.5%
-24.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.7% | +6.2% | -3.6% | +2.7% |
| 7D | -10.7% | -0.5% | -10.1% | -10.5% |
| 30D | -17.8% | -28.6% | +10.9% | -18.0% |
| 3M | +23.3% | -28.1% | +51.4% | +22.8% |
| 6M | +39.6% | -52.0% | +91.6% | +38.3% |
| YTD | +121.6% | -35.1% | +156.7% | +118.1% |
| 1Y | +88.2% | -54.0% | +142.2% | +85.5% |
| All | +184.3% | -38.3% | +222.5% | +186.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling