+99.3%
DINO vs ENPH
-70.0%
+169.3%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -5.4% | +5.3% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +2.0% | +3.4% | -1.4% | +1.7% |
| 30D | +27.7% | -10.3% | +37.9% | +28.6% |
| 3M | +56.3% | -31.4% | +87.7% | +60.3% |
| 6M | +107.6% | -10.1% | +117.7% | +105.2% |
| YTD | +140.2% | +14.6% | +125.6% | +129.3% |
| 1Y | +113.0% | -3.2% | +116.2% | +106.0% |
| All | +99.3% | -70.0% | +169.3% | +104.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling