+99.3%
DINO vs CRS
+636.8%
-537.4%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CRS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | 0.0% | -0.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +2.0% | -0.5% | +2.5% | +2.0% |
| 30D | +27.7% | -18.1% | +45.8% | +31.4% |
| 3M | +56.3% | -12.4% | +68.7% | +58.3% |
| 6M | +107.6% | +15.9% | +91.6% | +97.7% |
| YTD | +140.2% | +45.8% | +94.3% | +116.9% |
| 1Y | +113.0% | +87.8% | +25.2% | +80.1% |
| All | +99.3% | +636.8% | -537.4% | +24.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CRS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CRS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CRS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CRS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling