+99.3%
DINO vs CLBK
+51.6%
+47.8%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -1.3% | +1.1% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +2.0% | -1.5% | +3.4% | +2.4% |
| 30D | +27.7% | +6.7% | +21.0% | +25.0% |
| 3M | +56.3% | +21.2% | +35.1% | +46.6% |
| 6M | +107.6% | +42.0% | +65.6% | +83.9% |
| YTD | +140.2% | +63.3% | +76.9% | +102.5% |
| 1Y | +113.0% | +65.4% | +47.6% | +78.1% |
| All | +99.3% | +51.6% | +47.8% | +64.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling