+119.3%
DINO vs BTSG
+421.3%
-302.0%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BTSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.8% | +3.0% | -0.3% | +2.5% |
| 7D | +4.2% | +5.7% | -1.6% | +3.7% |
| 30D | +33.9% | +0.2% | +33.7% | +33.7% |
| 3M | +50.5% | +5.6% | +44.9% | +49.2% |
| 6M | +95.2% | +50.8% | +44.4% | +85.6% |
| YTD | +140.6% | +67.0% | +73.5% | +125.3% |
| 1Y | +119.0% | +145.5% | -26.6% | +93.2% |
| All | +119.3% | +421.3% | -302.0% | +78.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling