+103.7%
DINO vs ARMK
+120.0%
-16.3%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -0.9% | +0.2% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +5.7% | -2.4% | +8.1% | +6.3% |
| 30D | +27.8% | 0.0% | +27.8% | +27.7% |
| 3M | +45.6% | +6.7% | +39.0% | +43.2% |
| 6M | +88.5% | +38.8% | +49.6% | +71.1% |
| YTD | +134.1% | +55.2% | +78.9% | +103.3% |
| 1Y | +111.1% | +46.6% | +64.5% | +86.9% |
| All | +103.7% | +120.0% | -16.3% | +53.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling