+113.7%
DINO vs AMC
-58.0%
+171.7%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -2.3% | +3.3% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +8.4% | -3.4% | +4.9% |
| 30D | -19.9% | +9.2% | -29.1% | -20.0% |
| 3M | +16.8% | +32.0% | -15.2% | +16.1% |
| 6M | +44.8% | +149.3% | -104.4% | +41.3% |
| YTD | +128.0% | +114.1% | +13.9% | +122.5% |
| 1Y | +95.0% | +35.8% | +59.2% | +93.2% |
| All | +113.7% | -58.0% | +171.7% | +128.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling