+103.7%
DINO vs AMC
-67.9%
+171.6%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | +4.3% | -5.0% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +5.7% | +2.3% | +3.4% | +5.7% |
| 30D | +27.8% | -0.7% | +28.6% | +27.8% |
| 3M | +45.6% | +35.2% | +10.4% | +44.4% |
| 6M | +88.5% | +124.6% | -36.1% | +84.4% |
| YTD | +134.1% | +69.9% | +64.2% | +130.5% |
| 1Y | +111.1% | -2.6% | +113.7% | +110.7% |
| All | +103.7% | -67.9% | +171.6% | +111.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling