+103.7%
DINO vs ALHC
+140.1%
-36.4%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | 0.0% | -0.7% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +5.7% | -0.6% | +6.3% | +5.7% |
| 30D | +27.8% | -1.0% | +28.8% | +27.8% |
| 3M | +45.6% | -10.2% | +55.8% | +45.2% |
| 6M | +88.5% | -28.3% | +116.7% | +87.5% |
| YTD | +134.1% | -31.4% | +165.6% | +132.8% |
| 1Y | +111.1% | -16.9% | +128.0% | +110.2% |
| All | +103.7% | +140.1% | -36.4% | +110.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling