+107.1%
DINO vs ACM
-7.4%
+114.5%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +0.6% | -1.6% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -12.9% | +6.6% | -19.5% | -14.0% |
| 30D | -18.6% | +19.8% | -38.4% | -21.6% |
| 3M | +16.6% | -3.1% | +19.7% | +17.1% |
| 6M | +38.2% | -11.5% | +49.7% | +41.7% |
| YTD | +119.3% | -24.7% | +144.0% | +134.3% |
| 1Y | +84.3% | -45.1% | +129.3% | +126.2% |
| 3Y | +107.1% | -8.9% | +116.0% | +99.4% |
| All | +107.1% | -7.4% | +114.5% | +99.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling