+95.0%
DINO vs ACM
-19.2%
+114.2%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -0.4% | -0.3% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +5.7% | -3.7% | +9.5% | +6.6% |
| 30D | +27.8% | -11.1% | +38.9% | +30.8% |
| 3M | +45.6% | -8.0% | +53.6% | +47.4% |
| 6M | +88.5% | -29.7% | +118.1% | +106.3% |
| YTD | +134.1% | -29.4% | +163.5% | +153.6% |
| 1Y | +111.1% | -46.4% | +157.5% | +155.7% |
| All | +95.0% | -19.2% | +114.2% | +89.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling