+103.7%
DINO vs ABCL
+109.3%
-5.6%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -1.2% | +0.5% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +5.7% | +0.7% | +5.0% | +5.7% |
| 30D | +27.8% | +93.1% | -65.3% | +21.5% |
| 3M | +45.6% | +79.4% | -33.8% | +38.3% |
| 6M | +88.5% | +214.9% | -126.4% | +70.3% |
| YTD | +134.1% | +234.2% | -100.1% | +108.8% |
| 1Y | +111.1% | +174.8% | -63.6% | +90.2% |
| All | +103.7% | +109.3% | -5.6% | +55.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling