+96.5%
DINO vs ABCL
+156.0%
-59.5%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +6.7% | -7.3% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -15.5% | -3.2% | -12.3% | -15.4% |
| 30D | -16.0% | -7.4% | -8.6% | -15.7% |
| 3M | +17.9% | +81.9% | -64.0% | +12.1% |
| 6M | +38.5% | +135.7% | -97.2% | +28.1% |
| YTD | +115.8% | +247.4% | -131.5% | +91.2% |
| 1Y | +87.1% | +162.3% | -75.1% | +69.8% |
| 3Y | +96.5% | +165.5% | -69.0% | +63.2% |
| All | +96.5% | +156.0% | -59.5% | +63.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling