+113.8%
DINO vs ABCL
+185.8%
-72.0%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.1% | +1.1% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +5.7% | -3.3% | +9.0% | +5.9% |
| 30D | -19.6% | -7.1% | -12.4% | -19.4% |
| 3M | +11.8% | +4.7% | +7.1% | +10.7% |
| 6M | +49.0% | +140.9% | -91.9% | +37.6% |
| YTD | +128.1% | +236.0% | -107.8% | +102.8% |
| 1Y | +96.3% | +217.4% | -121.1% | +75.3% |
| 3Y | +113.8% | +188.7% | -74.9% | +76.7% |
| All | +113.8% | +185.8% | -72.0% | +76.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling