+61.6%
DIA vs PCG
-11.7%
+73.3%
-16.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +2.4% | -3.0% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -13.9% | +13.7% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -1.5% | -16.9% | +15.3% | +0.8% |
| 3M | +3.8% | -14.7% | +18.5% | +5.6% |
| 6M | +10.3% | -23.8% | +34.1% | +14.7% |
| YTD | +12.1% | -10.5% | +22.6% | +12.7% |
| 1Y | +18.6% | -5.1% | +23.8% | +17.6% |
| All | +61.6% | -11.7% | +73.3% | +59.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling