+59.7%
DIA vs PCG
-19.3%
+79.0%
-16.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +2.2% | -2.0% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +2.1% | +2.2% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
| 30D | +1.5% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +1.4% |
| 3M | -2.4% | -23.8% | +21.4% | +1.1% |
| 6M | +6.0% | -19.6% | +25.6% | +8.5% |
| YTD | +10.1% | -16.7% | +26.8% | +11.7% |
| 1Y | +11.8% | -19.4% | +31.2% | +14.3% |
| 3Y | +59.7% | -18.3% | +78.0% | +61.6% |
| All | +59.7% | -19.3% | +79.0% | +61.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling