+60.1%
DIA vs LII
-8.5%
+68.6%
-16.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | +0.8% | -0.3% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -2.3% | +0.7% | -1.1% |
| 30D | +1.3% | -1.7% | +3.0% | +1.4% |
| 3M | -2.1% | -18.3% | +16.2% | +1.9% |
| 6M | +6.2% | -32.3% | +38.6% | +14.0% |
| YTD | +10.3% | -27.1% | +37.5% | +15.6% |
| 1Y | +11.0% | -27.2% | +38.2% | +16.2% |
| All | +60.1% | -8.5% | +68.6% | +59.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling