+147.3%
DIA vs GLDM
+221.7%
-74.3%
-36.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | +0.8% | -4.4% | -3.6% |
| 7D | -1.6% | +1.9% | -3.5% | -1.8% |
| 30D | 0.0% | -1.7% | +1.7% | +0.1% |
| 3M | -4.9% | -3.5% | -1.4% | -4.6% |
| 6M | +5.0% | -10.1% | +15.1% | +6.0% |
| YTD | +8.2% | -5.0% | +13.3% | +8.5% |
| 1Y | +10.3% | +2.8% | +7.5% | +9.9% |
| 3Y | +58.4% | +105.1% | -46.7% | +46.5% |
| 5Y | +54.3% | +124.3% | -70.0% | +40.2% |
| All | +147.3% | +221.7% | -74.3% | +139.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling