+58.3%
DIA vs FCEL
-61.1%
+119.5%
-16.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FCEL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -6.7% | +6.0% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -1.2% | +15.1% | -16.3% | -1.7% |
| 30D | -2.7% | -16.4% | +13.8% | -2.4% |
| 3M | +3.3% | -5.3% | +8.5% | +2.5% |
| 6M | +10.4% | +124.5% | -114.1% | +5.8% |
| YTD | +10.0% | +126.7% | -116.7% | +5.0% |
| 1Y | +16.2% | +219.9% | -203.7% | +9.2% |
| All | +58.3% | -61.1% | +119.5% | +53.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FCEL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FCEL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FCEL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FCEL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling