-99.9%
DFNS vs GLDM
+137.5%
-237.3%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -0.9% | +1.5% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -16.0% | -0.5% | -15.5% | -16.0% |
| 30D | -77.7% | +4.4% | -82.1% | -77.6% |
| 3M | -77.2% | -1.1% | -76.1% | -77.8% |
| 6M | -95.2% | -13.7% | -81.5% | -95.5% |
| YTD | -98.0% | +2.8% | -100.7% | -97.9% |
| 1Y | -98.3% | +24.8% | -123.1% | -98.0% |
| 3Y | -99.9% | +127.8% | -227.7% | -99.8% |
| 5Y | -99.9% | +141.1% | -241.0% | -99.8% |
| All | -99.9% | +137.5% | -237.3% | -99.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling