-100.0%
DFNS vs AMC
-71.5%
-28.5%
-100.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -12.2% | +1.9% | -14.2% | -12.7% |
| 7D | -44.0% | +2.6% | -46.6% | -44.4% |
| 30D | -69.1% | +9.0% | -78.2% | -69.9% |
| 3M | -95.6% | +22.2% | -117.8% | -96.0% |
| 6M | -96.2% | +91.5% | -187.6% | -96.9% |
| YTD | -99.6% | +101.3% | -200.9% | -99.7% |
| 1Y | -99.7% | +20.8% | -120.5% | -99.8% |
| 3Y | -100.0% | -71.3% | -28.7% | -100.0% |
| All | -100.0% | -71.5% | -28.5% | -100.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling