+678.3%
DELL vs ZETA
+272.3%
+406.0%
-59.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -1.2% | +1.5% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +8.7% | -0.1% | +8.8% | +8.7% |
| 30D | +16.9% | +10.5% | +6.4% | +14.2% |
| 3M | +40.4% | +44.3% | -3.9% | +29.6% |
| 6M | +267.1% | +59.4% | +207.6% | +233.5% |
| YTD | +329.1% | +49.5% | +279.6% | +290.8% |
| 1Y | +346.9% | +62.7% | +284.2% | +298.3% |
| All | +678.3% | +272.3% | +406.0% | +497.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling