+358.3%
DELL vs XLF
+9.3%
+349.0%
-32.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +12.0% | +0.7% | +11.3% | +11.5% |
| 7D | +8.2% | -1.5% | +9.7% | +9.3% |
| 30D | +17.1% | -1.2% | +18.2% | +18.1% |
| 3M | +45.2% | +9.2% | +36.0% | +37.5% |
| 6M | +286.8% | +16.3% | +270.4% | +251.7% |
| YTD | +354.8% | +5.4% | +349.3% | +343.5% |
| 1Y | +358.3% | +7.6% | +350.7% | +330.5% |
| All | +358.3% | +9.3% | +349.0% | +330.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling