+697.3%
DELL vs TMF
-41.6%
+738.9%
-59.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TMF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | +0.4% | +1.1% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +14.9% | -1.4% | +16.3% | +14.9% |
| 30D | +13.3% | -2.8% | +16.1% | +13.4% |
| 3M | +24.4% | -10.9% | +35.3% | +24.6% |
| 6M | +258.0% | -21.3% | +279.3% | +257.2% |
| YTD | +320.2% | -15.9% | +336.1% | +320.3% |
| 1Y | +319.1% | -15.7% | +334.8% | +319.5% |
| All | +697.3% | -41.6% | +738.9% | +703.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TMF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TMF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TMF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TMF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling