+899.6%
DELL vs FLNC
-71.1%
+970.7%
-59.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | -4.2% | -1.1% | -4.7% |
| 7D | -1.9% | -5.0% | +3.1% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +14.9% | -26.1% | +41.0% | +20.0% |
| 3M | +37.2% | -55.2% | +92.4% | +52.9% |
| 6M | +254.0% | -42.6% | +296.6% | +270.1% |
| YTD | +306.1% | -51.0% | +357.2% | +326.5% |
| 1Y | +312.3% | +43.3% | +268.9% | +259.2% |
| 3Y | +654.0% | -63.4% | +717.4% | +607.8% |
| All | +899.6% | -71.1% | +970.7% | +733.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling