+258.0%
DELL vs FIG
-21.1%
+279.1%
-20.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FIG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -4.4% | +5.9% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +14.9% | -16.3% | +31.2% | +16.9% |
| 30D | +13.3% | -14.3% | +27.6% | +15.0% |
| 3M | +24.4% | +7.2% | +17.2% | +23.8% |
| 6M | +258.0% | -18.6% | +276.6% | +247.2% |
| All | +258.0% | -21.1% | +279.1% | +247.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling