+26.1%
DECK vs MTB
+101.8%
-75.7%
-64.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -0.1% | +1.6% | +1.6% |
| 7D | -2.2% | +1.7% | -3.9% | -3.0% |
| 30D | -13.6% | -4.2% | -9.4% | -12.0% |
| 3M | -21.2% | +8.9% | -30.1% | -24.1% |
| 6M | -21.1% | +10.9% | -32.0% | -24.5% |
| YTD | -17.2% | +21.5% | -38.7% | -23.8% |
| 1Y | -30.7% | +21.9% | -52.7% | -36.5% |
| 3Y | -3.4% | +109.2% | -112.6% | -27.7% |
| All | +26.1% | +101.8% | -75.7% | +2.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling