-8.7%
DECK vs LSCC
-12.1%
+3.3%
-32.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.0% | +1.3% | +4.7% | +6.0% |
| 7D | +10.4% | +3.0% | +7.4% | +10.3% |
| 30D | +11.1% | -19.3% | +30.4% | +11.3% |
| 3M | -10.8% | -22.3% | +11.5% | -10.7% |
| 6M | -8.7% | -14.6% | +5.8% | -12.4% |
| All | -8.7% | -12.1% | +3.3% | -12.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling