-1.8%
DECK vs LNT
+51.2%
-53.0%
-64.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +1.6% |
| 7D | -2.2% | -0.1% | -2.1% | -2.2% |
| 30D | -13.6% | -3.2% | -10.4% | -13.4% |
| 3M | -21.2% | -4.1% | -17.2% | -20.9% |
| 6M | -21.1% | -4.6% | -16.5% | -20.7% |
| YTD | -17.2% | +7.0% | -24.2% | -17.0% |
| 1Y | -30.7% | +8.3% | -39.0% | -30.7% |
| All | -1.8% | +51.2% | -53.0% | -2.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling