+74.4%
DE vs PENG
+101.4%
-27.0%
-19.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +6.4% | -6.6% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +10.0% | +4.5% | +5.5% | +9.6% |
| 30D | +13.3% | -7.1% | +20.4% | +13.8% |
| 3M | +17.5% | -27.3% | +44.8% | +19.1% |
| 6M | +13.6% | +169.6% | -156.0% | +2.3% |
| YTD | +49.8% | +164.6% | -114.8% | +34.9% |
| 1Y | +47.9% | +109.5% | -61.6% | +35.2% |
| All | +74.4% | +101.4% | -27.0% | +51.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling