+76.5%
DE vs NTAP
+144.6%
-68.2%
-19.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -0.6% | +0.7% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -1.0% | -1.4% | -2.2% |
| 30D | +9.7% | -7.5% | +17.2% | +11.0% |
| 3M | +21.4% | +14.6% | +6.7% | +18.2% |
| 6M | +15.0% | +91.0% | -76.0% | -0.1% |
| YTD | +46.4% | +73.7% | -27.3% | +29.6% |
| 1Y | +45.6% | +51.2% | -5.6% | +32.6% |
| All | +76.5% | +144.6% | -68.2% | +41.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling