+76.9%
DE vs MULL
+2,481.0%
-2,404.2%
-19.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MULL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -3.0% | +1.2% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +0.7% | +14.0% | -13.3% | +0.1% |
| 30D | +9.6% | +24.8% | -15.2% | +8.5% |
| 3M | +19.0% | -16.1% | +35.1% | +18.0% |
| 6M | +16.1% | +330.9% | -314.8% | +4.6% |
| YTD | +47.0% | +545.0% | -498.0% | +27.8% |
| 1Y | +43.1% | +2,427.1% | -2,384.0% | +9.7% |
| All | +76.9% | +2,481.0% | -2,404.2% | +26.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MULL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MULL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MULL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MULL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling