+77.2%
DE vs LCID
-92.2%
+169.4%
-19.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -1.1% | -0.8% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +0.7% | +1.8% | -1.1% | +0.6% |
| 30D | +9.6% | -34.2% | +43.9% | +12.7% |
| 3M | +19.0% | -9.1% | +28.1% | +18.4% |
| 6M | +16.1% | -52.6% | +68.7% | +20.8% |
| YTD | +47.0% | -56.2% | +103.2% | +53.3% |
| 1Y | +43.1% | -74.9% | +118.0% | +54.9% |
| All | +77.2% | -92.2% | +169.4% | +116.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling