+46.6%
DE vs GLDM
-1.4%
+48.0%
-19.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -2.6% | +2.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +3.3% | +2.9% | +0.4% | +2.9% |
| 30D | +10.7% | -3.9% | +14.6% | +11.3% |
| 3M | +13.1% | -8.1% | +21.3% | +14.3% |
| 6M | +20.2% | -14.7% | +34.9% | +23.1% |
| YTD | +48.9% | -6.6% | +55.5% | +54.3% |
| 1Y | +46.6% | -2.1% | +48.7% | +54.2% |
| All | +46.6% | -1.4% | +48.0% | +54.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling