+45.8%
DE vs GLDM
+22.3%
+23.6%
-19.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -0.9% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +10.0% | -0.5% | +10.6% | +10.1% |
| 30D | +13.3% | +4.4% | +8.9% | +12.6% |
| 3M | +17.5% | -1.1% | +18.6% | +17.7% |
| 6M | +13.6% | -13.7% | +27.2% | +15.8% |
| YTD | +49.8% | +2.8% | +47.0% | +52.4% |
| All | +45.8% | +22.3% | +23.6% | +57.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling