+75.9%
DE vs FANG
+45.3%
+30.6%
-19.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FANG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -0.2% | -0.1% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -2.6% | +2.9% | -5.5% | -3.1% |
| 30D | +9.0% | +2.6% | +6.4% | +8.5% |
| 3M | +19.1% | +7.6% | +11.6% | +17.2% |
| 6M | +14.4% | +17.3% | -2.9% | +9.4% |
| YTD | +45.9% | +38.7% | +7.3% | +33.7% |
| 1Y | +43.6% | +51.6% | -8.0% | +28.3% |
| 3Y | +75.9% | +50.0% | +25.9% | +52.2% |
| All | +75.9% | +45.3% | +30.6% | +52.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FANG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FANG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FANG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FANG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling