+89.6%
DE vs BHP
+53.3%
+36.3%
-19.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -1.3% | +0.5% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -0.5% | +0.8% | +0.4% |
| 30D | +3.6% | -4.5% | +8.1% | +4.9% |
| 3M | +10.2% | -6.9% | +17.1% | +12.1% |
| 6M | +16.6% | -10.6% | +27.1% | +19.6% |
| YTD | +45.8% | +37.2% | +8.6% | +27.6% |
| 1Y | +43.9% | +48.0% | -4.1% | +22.3% |
| 3Y | +89.6% | +52.6% | +37.1% | +54.4% |
| All | +89.6% | +53.3% | +36.3% | +54.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling