+89.6%
DE vs ACGL
+33.8%
+55.8%
-19.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | +0.3% | -1.1% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +0.3% | +2.2% | -1.9% | -0.1% |
| 30D | +3.6% | +12.3% | -8.7% | +1.6% |
| 3M | +10.2% | +11.8% | -1.6% | +8.3% |
| 6M | +16.6% | +17.5% | -0.9% | +13.6% |
| YTD | +45.8% | +14.3% | +31.5% | +42.7% |
| 1Y | +43.9% | +18.2% | +25.7% | +40.1% |
| 3Y | +89.6% | +33.2% | +56.5% | +94.9% |
| All | +89.6% | +33.8% | +55.8% | +94.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling