+118.0%
DDOG vs TFC
+102.9%
+15.1%
-48.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TFC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +0.1% | -0.9% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -10.1% | +2.4% | -12.6% | -10.8% |
| 30D | -24.8% | -1.3% | -23.5% | -24.5% |
| 3M | -12.6% | +6.1% | -18.7% | -14.6% |
| 6M | +79.9% | +7.3% | +72.6% | +73.3% |
| YTD | +56.6% | +8.2% | +48.4% | +50.3% |
| 1Y | +61.6% | +14.4% | +47.1% | +50.8% |
| All | +118.0% | +102.9% | +15.1% | +71.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TFC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TFC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TFC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TFC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling