+24.0%
DBX vs NIO
-60.1%
+84.2%
-37.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -4.9% | +5.0% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -3.3% | -14.5% | +11.2% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -5.9% | -15.0% | +9.1% | -5.5% |
| 3M | -6.7% | -35.6% | +28.9% | -5.6% |
| 6M | +28.0% | -55.7% | +83.6% | +30.7% |
| YTD | +20.6% | -43.1% | +63.7% | +22.0% |
| 1Y | +10.3% | -53.5% | +63.8% | +12.4% |
| 3Y | +24.0% | -59.8% | +83.9% | +25.9% |
| All | +24.0% | -60.1% | +84.2% | +25.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling