+168.1%
DAL vs LDOS
+35.4%
+132.7%
-47.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.3% | +0.1% | -4.4% | -4.4% |
| 7D | +4.6% | -3.7% | +8.3% | +5.5% |
| 30D | +2.3% | +16.4% | -14.1% | -1.7% |
| 3M | -8.1% | +7.4% | -15.5% | -10.3% |
| 6M | +21.4% | -0.3% | +21.8% | +21.3% |
| YTD | +24.3% | -24.0% | +48.3% | +35.4% |
| 1Y | +47.4% | -29.6% | +76.9% | +64.9% |
| All | +168.1% | +35.4% | +132.7% | +132.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling