+98.5%
DAL vs ACGL
+34.2%
+64.2%
-47.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | -1.7% | +3.5% | +2.2% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -0.7% | +0.9% | +0.3% |
| 30D | -13.9% | -1.0% | -12.9% | -13.7% |
| 3M | +1.1% | +11.0% | -10.0% | -1.6% |
| 6M | +26.2% | -0.3% | +26.6% | +26.0% |
| YTD | +16.4% | +2.3% | +14.2% | +15.2% |
| 1Y | +33.9% | +6.4% | +27.5% | +30.8% |
| All | +98.5% | +34.2% | +64.2% | +91.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling