+72.2%
D vs UMAC
+216.2%
-144.0%
-16.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +0.5% | -0.9% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -2.9% | +0.5% | -2.4% |
| 30D | +9.0% | -35.6% | +44.6% | +9.3% |
| 3M | +1.0% | -51.3% | +52.2% | +1.5% |
| 6M | +11.0% | -17.5% | +28.5% | +10.7% |
| YTD | +19.8% | -0.7% | +20.5% | +18.9% |
| 1Y | +16.0% | +16.5% | -0.5% | +14.7% |
| All | +72.2% | +216.2% | -144.0% | +59.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling