+75.2%
D vs NIO
-56.4%
+131.6%
-16.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +0.6% | -1.1% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +0.8% | +6.9% | -6.1% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +10.7% | -4.7% | +15.5% | +10.8% |
| 3M | +2.3% | -28.1% | +30.3% | +2.7% |
| 6M | +12.5% | -41.7% | +54.2% | +13.3% |
| YTD | +20.1% | -33.1% | +53.2% | +20.5% |
| 1Y | +15.6% | -50.3% | +65.8% | +16.6% |
| 3Y | +75.2% | -54.4% | +129.5% | +73.8% |
| All | +75.2% | -56.4% | +131.6% | +73.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling