+75.8%
CZFS vs VOO
+75.5%
+0.3%
-38.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +0.3% | -1.7% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -2.7% | +2.1% | +1.7% |
| 30D | +7.5% | -5.4% | +12.9% | +12.5% |
| 3M | +3.8% | -4.1% | +7.9% | +7.2% |
| 6M | +34.7% | +0.7% | +33.9% | +32.3% |
| YTD | +52.2% | +8.7% | +43.4% | +38.3% |
| 1Y | +58.3% | +11.0% | +47.3% | +40.3% |
| 3Y | +75.8% | +75.5% | +0.3% | +3.7% |
| All | +75.8% | +75.5% | +0.3% | +3.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling