-99.6%
CYCU vs NIO
-15.4%
-84.2%
-99.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -1.6% | +0.2% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -8.1% | -13.0% | +5.0% | -1.6% |
| 30D | -43.0% | -18.3% | -24.7% | -37.1% |
| 3M | -50.8% | -33.2% | -17.6% | -41.8% |
| 6M | -74.1% | -21.5% | -52.6% | -72.4% |
| YTD | -84.0% | -25.5% | -58.5% | -82.6% |
| 1Y | -92.2% | -38.0% | -54.2% | -90.7% |
| All | -99.6% | -15.4% | -84.2% | -99.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling