+41.9%
CVX vs NIO
-62.6%
+104.5%
-20.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -1.6% | +0.3% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +3.3% | -13.0% | +16.4% | +3.8% |
| 30D | +12.9% | -18.3% | +31.2% | +13.6% |
| 3M | +11.7% | -33.2% | +44.9% | +13.3% |
| 6M | +14.1% | -21.5% | +35.6% | +14.6% |
| YTD | +40.7% | -25.5% | +66.2% | +41.4% |
| 1Y | +37.5% | -38.0% | +75.5% | +39.3% |
| All | +41.9% | -62.6% | +104.5% | +40.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling